MICAH JOHNSON AND
NAT TURNER
Given what I’m about to say, I’m embarrassed to admit it:
I’m a white person who is both embarrassed and ashamed. When I saw the reports about the shootings of
Philando Castile and Alton Sterling, I was struck dumb. The only thought that came to my mind was
“breaking point!”
If after all the shootings of Black men wasn’t enough, now
two more? What were the policemen
thinking who caused these two deaths? Do
they live in this country? Are they totally
unaware of the frightening spike in racial tensions that have grown
increasingly intense with each new death?
It was just a matter of time. Having come of age in the period of Dr.
King’s non-violent civil rights movement, I hoped the peace would hold but
somehow I already knew it wouldn’t.
I think half the country had the same “dark foreboding”
something bad was going to happen. Maybe
we were still shocked when the news came out of Dallas that five officers had
been gunned down by Micah Johnson—shocked but not surprised . . . and then Gavin
Long in Baton Rouge killed three more.
One story after another to send one’s head reeling . . .
violence out of France---terrorist attacks in Paris and Nice--and then a long
string of killings of Black men in America, culminating in two attacks upon
police officers in Dallas and Baton Rouge: and the name Micah Johnson was
broadcast to the world.
I heard reports discussing whether this was a “new normal”
and whether such violent attacks would become monthly, weekly, or daily. The consensus seemed to be “weekly”.
Indeed, I do not know if I’ll be able to finish writing about
these recent events before the next death of a Black man or the next attack on
a police officer occurs. I’ll try . . . but
there’s no guarantee.
Although I want to say “I hate Micah Johnson”, I can’t. And although I’d like to blame him for everything and pretend the crime starts
and stops with him, I can’t do that
either.
The long racial nightmare of America is too omnipresent to
pretend this act didn’t happen within the context of America’s brutal mistreatment
of Black people ever since the very beginning of colonial times, continuing on through
the Revolution, Civil War, Jim Crow laws, and Segregation.
Racism and second-class citizenship ruled the land. The brutality of the slave-owner gave way to
the brutality of the KKK and the police.
If ever a shooting had context, this one does.
And then a long-forgotten name came to my mind: Nat
Turner. He was probably the most hated
Black man in the South ever. Nat had “got
religion” and felt a higher calling to free himself and his people. Against hopeless odds, he led a small slave
rebellion. He and his followers armed
themselves the best they could and started killing white people. Eventually enough white men rallied to arms
to stop him and then began the reprisals, the hangings of hundreds.
It wasn’t pretty what Nat had done: it was brutal and
murderous. It wasn’t pretty what Micah
Johnson did, either. And yet, regarding
Nat Turner’s slave rebellion, what of the context of Slavery with Black slaves
routinely exploited, oppressed, and brutalized with no hope of escape or
emancipation?
Nat Turner’s act of bloody defiance raised him to heroic
heights in the eyes of other slaves and among those who cherish freedom, if one
understands that desperate times produce desperate measures; he struck a blow
against Slavery and was willing to sacrifice his life in the larger struggle
for freedom.
In a strange way--in this sense of desperation, this sense
of needing to strike and deliver a counter blow-- Micah Johnson has something in
common with Nat Turner. Of course, no
one is going to say the year 2016 looks anything like the year 1831. It’s a vastly different time in so many ways,
thankfully. But we would be amiss not to
acknowledge that we must also deal with perception.
For Black people everywhere in the country--and for a growing
number of white people, too--the videos showing police officers killing Black
people for insufficient cause has shocked and outraged us past the point of
comprehension.
Marches have been held; old groups and new organizations,
like Black Lives Matter, do what they can to protest and bring about change;
and yet the killings keep on happening. Nothing
stops or slows down such incidents and even if an officer is charged there
never seems to be a conviction.
And then the “breaking point” arrives, ready or not: the
point at which a person decides working through normal channels is too slow or of
no avail. Something snaps into place or
out of place: it hardly matters. The lethal intention takes over.
Something bigger and more dramatic must be invoked—and so
the shots rang out in Dallas and Baton Rouge that killed police officers who,
in the eyes of many, were “innocent” and only “doing their duty”. Yes, they were murdered and that is the worst
of all crimes. Such crimes must be
condemned by all.
And that is true and doubly true so far as it
goes—especially if we never wish to talk context or discuss the long string of
shootings of Black men, most unarmed, that preceded these god-awful events.
We have a choice: to take into consideration the historical
context of these shootings or pretend they are spontaneous crimes unrelated to
social reality. Blame the shooter for
being crazy, violent, sick, psychopathic, or what have you—but the context
still won’t dissolve away.
The first way leads to discussion and hope; the second way
leads to more shootings and more deaths, both black and white, with more
bereaved families, more widows and fatherless children.
And as for the invisible link between Micah Johnson and Nat
Turner? I’ll leave the reader with these
remarks from the author of Nat Turner’s
Slave Rebellion:
“If and when humanism arrives and animalism is driven from
the world, Nat Turner will be labeled as one who fought against the
latter. His motives will be admired and
sadness, and amazement, perhaps, will grip the observer who will realize that,
with those admirable motives, society, as then arranged, made his bloody deeds necessary.” (emphasis added)